During the COVID-19 pandemic, neuropsychiatric disorders have been diagnosed both in the acute phase, and in the aftermath of this disease. Inpatients, as well as outpatients recently diagnosed with mild, moderate or severe forms of Coronavirus infection have reported neuropsychiatric manifestations with variable duration, symptoms that could be directly or indirectly related to the viral pathogenic agent. Patients who are recovering from the acute phase of COVID-19 also may exhibit various psychopathological manifestations, during the so-called “post-COVID-19 syndrome” or “long COVID-19 syndrome”. Explanations regarding the onset of this type of clinical manifestations and the SARS-CoV-2 infection are extremely diverse, ranging from biological factors (e.g., direct central nervous system viral activity, cerebral hypo- oxygenation, high level of inflammatory response) to psycho-social stressors (e.g., isolation, fear of death, anxiety related to possible somatic complications or sequelae). Objectives: The primary objective of this article was to analyze psychiatric manifestations in patients with acute COVID-19 disease and in patients during post-COVID-19 phase. The secondary objective was to propose a conceptual framework for the evaluation and treatment of these patients. Methods: Patients included in this analysis were screened positive for COVID-19 infection in the last 6 months before their first psychiatric examination. These patients were further evaluated to detect any personal history of psychiatric disorders, somatic comorbidities, or significant concomitant pharmacological treatments. Specific scales for the measurement of symptoms severity and functional impairment were administered in all patients. Results: Five patients were included in this analysis, one during the acute phase of COVID-19 infection, and four patients were evaluated after the complete remission of this disease. Hyperactive delirium, mild neurocognitive disorder, major depressive episode, panic disorder with agoraphobia, or acute psychotic disorder were the main diagnoses in these patients. All patients received adequate treatment and they were monitored using psychological scales until symptoms remission or stabilisation. Conclusions: Psychosocial stressors, neurobiological changes, systemic inflammatory reaction, and individual vulnerability factors may contribute to a diathesis- stress model for psychiatric disorders onset within the acute phase or after the remission of acute manifestations in COVID- 19-diagnosed patients.
Isolation and quarantine during the Covid-19 pandemic affected the lifestyle and daily functioning of the population around the world, leading to social, psychological, and economic changes which further multiplied the stress related to the threat of coronavirus contagion by adding financial, relational, academic, professional and mental health vulnerabilities. To assess the impact of isolation and quarantine over the quality of life in the Romanian population, we conducted a Web-based survey focused on the evaluation of stress level, perception of lifestyle changes, communication patterns, mental health, major concerns, perception of one’s future, but also on the preferred coping strategies that people have used to deal with the isolation stress. The answers were collected during one month and the results for the first 2 weeks of quarantine/isolation were compared with the results after one month of such regimen. Several recommendations based on the survey results analysis were formulated regarding possible strategies for decreasing the impact of stress factors over the general population and specific, vulnerable groups.
A unique approach to the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is difficult to support, because of the complexity and heterogeneity of this pathology. Multiple evidence-based guidelines for PTSD treatment exist, elaborated by prestigious institutions around the world, but a certain level of the inconsistency of their recommendations appears when these sources are compared with each other. Therefore, a review of current guidelines and extraction of the most supported by evidence recommendations is considered important for clinical practice, due to the need to approach such complex cases as PTSD-diagnosed patients in a stepwise manner. Structured monitoring of the clinical status during the treatment is also an important and rather neglected aspect of the case management in PTSD, and the necessity of follow-up visits for efficacy and tolerability should be taken into consideration. Psychotherapy (especially cognitive- behavioral oriented therapies and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy) is supported by evidence as a first-line approach, as well as certain antidepressants, like the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine. Many second-line pharmacological agents and psychotherapies are also available, but there is an obvious need for more pragmatic trials with PTSD patients.
Background: A large number of augmentation agents have been tried in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, because negative and cognitive symptoms are difficult-to-treat with current pharmacological agents, and because the high percentage of treatment-resistant cases requires new therapeutic solutions. Inflammation is one of the supposed pathophysiological mechanisms in schizophrenia; therefore, antibiotics have been explored as add-on agents. No systematic review or meta-analysis about the efficacy of antibiotics in psychotic disorders has yet been conducted. Objectives: To assess if the use of antibiotics as add-on to current antipsychotic treatment may improve core symptoms of schizophrenia spectrum disorders, global clinical status, overall functionality, and if this augmentation strategy is well tolerated. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted, including papers published between 1980 and 2018, which have been found in the main electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, NCBI, Embase, Thomson Reuters/Web of Science). The keyword search strategy was formulated using the following paradigm: „schizophrenia spectrum disorders”/ „schizophrenia”/ „schizo-affective disorder”/ „schizophreniform disorder”, AND „antibiotics”/ all the names of currently marketed antibiotics classes. This review was registered to PROSPERO database with the protocol number CRD42019119152. Results: Based on reviewing the selected trials regarding the efficacy of antibiotics over core symptoms of schizophrenia, only two agents were detected – minocycline and D-cycloserine. Minocycline as add-on to antipsychotic treatment was associated with mixed results, while regarding the efficacy of d-cycloserine either no significant difference, or superiority to placebo over negative and cognitive symptoms was reported. Minocycline had an overall effect over the clinical impression that was not distinguishable from placebo, although there was one trial supporting the efficacy of this antibiotic. The impact of minocycline over the global functioning when added to antipsychotic in patients with schizophrenia was mixed, with one positive and one negative trial (moderate to high quality designed trials). D-cycloserine had no significant impact over global clinical status or patients’ overall functionality. Conclusion: From all the data reviewed and hierarchized resulted that larger trials are needed in order to confirm the efficacy of antibiotics as add-on to antipsychotics over negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
Treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is a severely disabling disorder, which decreases dramatically the quality of life and overall functionality, while it increases the rate of hospital admissions and overall healthcare costs. The main objective of this research was to evaluate the risk factors for TRS in a group of patients based on a retrospective analysis. The secondary objective was to design an algorithm for initial evaluation in patients with schizophrenia, in order to detect the candidates at risk for developing TRS. Medical charts and consultation records of all patients aged between 18 and 30, diagnosed with TRS, evaluated during 1-year in our department, were selected for analysis. The most significant risk factors for TRS found in univariate model were younger age at schizophrenia onset, male gender, living in rural areas, co-morbid drug dependence, lower therapeutic adherence, and premorbid personality disorder. Marginally significant were higher Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores at previous admissions, higher scores on PANSS negative symptoms sub-scale, and lower educational background. In the multivariate model, TRS was still significantly predicted (p<0.05) by younger age at the disease onset, addictive co-morbidity, and lower therapeutic adherence. An algorithm based on these risk factors is suggested, based on (a) structured PANSS evaluation using SCI-PANSS and Informant Questionnaire for PANSS, (b) a scale for the detection of co-morbid drug dependence (i.e. Inventory of Drug Taking Situations, IDTS), (c) an interview for detecting premorbid personality disorders (i.e. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV – Axis II Disorders, SCID-II), and (d) Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for therapeutic adherence monitoring. Also, the inclusion of several pharmacogenetic parameters (at least CYP450 2D6 panel for detection of poor/ultrarapid metabolizers) could be useful when establishing an adequate therapeutic management, and may help in decreasing the rate of non- response due to variations in antipsychotics plasma levels.
Late-life major depression is a high-incidence and difficult-to-treat affective disorder. Diagnosis of major depression in old age could also could be a challenge, due to aspects like (1) there is a higher vulnerability to the stigma of depression in this population, (2) hypochondriac ideation and somatic symptoms are the main symptoms, while depressive disposition or anhedonia are under-reported by such patients, (3) differential diagnosis includes various organic diseases, but also several psychiatric disorders, like neurocognitive disorders, organic affective disorders, drug induced affective disorders etc. Reduction of social relationships caused by retirement and loss of spouse and friends, as well as a decrease of personal income could precipitate or maintain depressive disorders during late-life. Quality of life in patients diagnosed with depressive major disorders is a rarely monitored parameter, although its importance for case management could not be overemphasized. A reduction of life quality correlates with a poorer functional prognosis, persistence of neglected residual symptoms, low adherence to treatment plan etc.
Matching drugs with anxiolytic properties- but without the potential of inducing dependence or abuse- with clinical manifestations of various affective disorders is a very important challenge for psychiatrists. Although the first line of pharmacologic treatment for anxiety disorders remains antidepressants with serotoninergic properties, calcium channel alpha-2-delta ligands are adjuvant agents which could be useful for augmenting antidepressant agents’ clinical effects. Unfortunately, calcium channel alpha-2-delta ligands efficacy and tolerability are not very well known, due to a lack of large scale, randomized, placebo-controlled trials focused on psychiatric disorders. Data regarding pregabalin and gabapentin pharmacology and clinical effects are reviewed and conclusions with pragmatically impact based on the discovered evidence are formulated accordingly.
