The conundrum of post-psychotic depression (PPD) is still present in the psychiatric literature, for more than a century since it was first described by Mayer-Gross. After a short existence in the DSM-IV and ICD-10, this nosological construct was excluded from newer versions of the mental disorders classifications. Therefore, an exploratory analysis of the PPD concept was considered useful both from clinical and theoretical perspectives. There is a high prevalence of depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and, although not all of them represent cases of PPD, they are considered risk factors for suicide. The arguments and contra-arguments for/against PPD were reviewed, and the potential pharmacological interventions for this disorder were analyzed. The explored evidence indicates that PPD is worth further investigation, and in order to differentiate it from schizoaffective disorder, negative symptoms of SSD, or depressive manifestations within the acute psychotic episodes, clearly defined criteria should be found. The use of validated scales, like the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia and the InterSePT Scale for Suicidal Thinking, is recommended for the initial assessment of depression and suicidal risk in patients with SSD, but also for their monitoring during the acute and maintenance phases. Besides the administration of combined, antidepressant and antipsychotic treatment, the use of clozapine, and the recommendation to initiate treatment for SSD with atypical antipsychotics whenever possible, there is a dearth of studies exploring specific interventions for PPD. Future studies are expected to address the validity of the nosological construct of PPD and the most adequate therapeutic and prophylactic interventions in patients with SSD.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, neuropsychiatric disorders have been diagnosed both in the acute phase, and in the aftermath of this disease. Inpatients, as well as outpatients recently diagnosed with mild, moderate or severe forms of Coronavirus infection have reported neuropsychiatric manifestations with variable duration, symptoms that could be directly or indirectly related to the viral pathogenic agent. Patients who are recovering from the acute phase of COVID-19 also may exhibit various psychopathological manifestations, during the so-called “post-COVID-19 syndrome” or “long COVID-19 syndrome”. Explanations regarding the onset of this type of clinical manifestations and the SARS-CoV-2 infection are extremely diverse, ranging from biological factors (e.g., direct central nervous system viral activity, cerebral hypo- oxygenation, high level of inflammatory response) to psycho-social stressors (e.g., isolation, fear of death, anxiety related to possible somatic complications or sequelae). Objectives: The primary objective of this article was to analyze psychiatric manifestations in patients with acute COVID-19 disease and in patients during post-COVID-19 phase. The secondary objective was to propose a conceptual framework for the evaluation and treatment of these patients. Methods: Patients included in this analysis were screened positive for COVID-19 infection in the last 6 months before their first psychiatric examination. These patients were further evaluated to detect any personal history of psychiatric disorders, somatic comorbidities, or significant concomitant pharmacological treatments. Specific scales for the measurement of symptoms severity and functional impairment were administered in all patients. Results: Five patients were included in this analysis, one during the acute phase of COVID-19 infection, and four patients were evaluated after the complete remission of this disease. Hyperactive delirium, mild neurocognitive disorder, major depressive episode, panic disorder with agoraphobia, or acute psychotic disorder were the main diagnoses in these patients. All patients received adequate treatment and they were monitored using psychological scales until symptoms remission or stabilisation. Conclusions: Psychosocial stressors, neurobiological changes, systemic inflammatory reaction, and individual vulnerability factors may contribute to a diathesis- stress model for psychiatric disorders onset within the acute phase or after the remission of acute manifestations in COVID- 19-diagnosed patients.
A unique approach to the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is difficult to support, because of the complexity and heterogeneity of this pathology. Multiple evidence-based guidelines for PTSD treatment exist, elaborated by prestigious institutions around the world, but a certain level of the inconsistency of their recommendations appears when these sources are compared with each other. Therefore, a review of current guidelines and extraction of the most supported by evidence recommendations is considered important for clinical practice, due to the need to approach such complex cases as PTSD-diagnosed patients in a stepwise manner. Structured monitoring of the clinical status during the treatment is also an important and rather neglected aspect of the case management in PTSD, and the necessity of follow-up visits for efficacy and tolerability should be taken into consideration. Psychotherapy (especially cognitive- behavioral oriented therapies and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy) is supported by evidence as a first-line approach, as well as certain antidepressants, like the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine. Many second-line pharmacological agents and psychotherapies are also available, but there is an obvious need for more pragmatic trials with PTSD patients.
Matching drugs with anxiolytic properties- but without the potential of inducing dependence or abuse- with clinical manifestations of various affective disorders is a very important challenge for psychiatrists. Although the first line of pharmacologic treatment for anxiety disorders remains antidepressants with serotoninergic properties, calcium channel alpha-2-delta ligands are adjuvant agents which could be useful for augmenting antidepressant agents’ clinical effects. Unfortunately, calcium channel alpha-2-delta ligands efficacy and tolerability are not very well known, due to a lack of large scale, randomized, placebo-controlled trials focused on psychiatric disorders. Data regarding pregabalin and gabapentin pharmacology and clinical effects are reviewed and conclusions with pragmatically impact based on the discovered evidence are formulated accordingly.
Background: Behavioral addictions (BAs), including gambling disorder, gaming disorder, problematic pornography use, compulsive sexual behavior, and problematic internet use, have received increasing attention because of their potential impact on mental health, occupational functioning, and military readiness. Objectives: To identify military-specific risk factors, clinical and operational consequences, barriers to detection and treatment, and gaps in prevention strategies related to BAs among active-duty personnel and veterans, and to propose a framework for prevention and early intervention. Methods: A narrative evidence synthesis was conducted using studies evaluating BAs in military and veteran populations, and data were extracted regarding prevalence, risk factors, psychiatric comorbidities, functional outcomes, help-seeking barriers, and intervention approaches. Findings were analyzed thematically to identify common patterns across different BAs and to inform the development of a military-specific prevention framework. Results: Evidence consistently indicated that military personnel and veterans are at increased risk of confronting multiple vulnerability factors for BAs, including trauma exposure, deployment-related stress, social isolation, boredom, sleep disruption, risk- taking tendencies, and barriers to help-seeking. Gambling disorder and problematic gaming were the most extensively studied conditions and were associated with depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, substance use disorders, suicidality, impaired occupational functioning, financial difficulties, and reduced operational readiness. Also, emerging evidence suggests similar associations for problematic pornography use, compulsive sexual behavior, and problematic internet use. Across studies, stigma, concerns about career repercussions, and limited awareness of available services represented important obstacles to treatment engagement. Conclusions: BAs represent an under-recognized challenge to military health and force readiness, while the available evidence supports implementing integrated prevention strategies that include routine screening, psychoeducation, commander training, confidential referral pathways, and early intervention programs. A comprehensive military-specific framework targeting behavioral addictions may improve individual well-being while reducing operational and organizational consequences.
