Clinicians, professors of medicine in general, students, and professionals from the health sciences tend to focus their efforts on technical training related to their discipline in practice as well as activities that produce some benefit direct or personal satisfaction. It is unusual to devote time and effort to training in areas such as teaching or expand their skills in sociological and organizational aspects. Would you like to take a course on strategic planning if not a director or officer of the hospital? Manage time in your schedule for a workshop on communication and conflict management? Have room in your schedule for educational activities on leadership, organizational change, and diffusion of innovations, science or science complexity of implementation? Generally, doctors and teachers do not spend much time on these activities (at least voluntarily) because we feel that what we have learned from these topics on personal experience is enough [1]. Effective teamwork, not only in the operating room but also throughout the perioperative route is considered an important and critical component of the safety and effectiveness of surgical care and leads to good results and quick recovery of surgical patients. Therefore, considerable efforts have been made to understand how teams work within the route of surgical care and to improve teamwork [2]. The simple act of bringing together some experts does not guarantee that turned out an expert team. Given the evidence suggests that teamwork in the operating room sometimes is far from harmonious and effective, the importance of training the surgical team to work effectively is receiving international acceptance as a key strategy to maximize safety in surgery. This systematic literature review aims to present a review of literature that focuses on the importance and role of leadership skills in the surgeon and how these skills can play a significant role in increasing the quality of care and patients’ safety in operating room (OR) settings.
According to the results of the conducted study there were distinguished the peculiarities of perception of the image of a junior officer by servicemen who participated in hostilities and had various PTSD symptoms. The study included 233 male servicemen with combat experience. The age of the participants varied from 20 to 55 years. It was determined that the image perception of the direct commander by the servicemen who did not have any PTSD symptoms had been influenced by both the key features of the modern way of fighting and the way a protective mechanism of consciousness acted, which gave the possibility to maintain mental health under combat conditions. These servicemen considered the awareness, kindness, and physical strength of their commander to be not important. The first stage was occupied by his/her ability to adequately fulfill his/her leadership function and the power of his/her spirit – the courage and love of the Motherland, which formed his/her reliability. Servicemen who had PTSD symptoms were less satisfied with the role of a junior officer and considered him/her to be less capable of meeting their expectations. They were less interested in commanders who could involve them in situations that required quick, brave action and complete responsibility for the entrusted part of common affairs. The most important factors in the structure of the direct commander image in both studied groups were the power of personality (the ability of self-regulation); however, the servicemen with PTSD symptoms had a specific orientation of these factors – to help their subordinates. They were quite selfishly aimed at using their direct commanders as a way of getting help.