Introduction: Self expandable metal stents (SEMS) are developed lately, as an effective and safe, less invasive alternative of surgery for the treatment of malignant intestinal/biliary obstruction. Recently, SEMS are also introduced in benign pathology. Aim: The aim of this presentation is to report a retrospective analysis of the total number of SEMS placed for esophageal, enteral, colorectal and biliary obstruction during the last 3 years in Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest, as well to review the literature published on this issue. Methods: Between 2013-2015 in Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest, we have placed: 232 esophageal stents, 23 enteral stents, 5 colonic stents and 75 biliary stents under radiologic guidance. The main parameters followed were represented by: sex, age, grades of obstruction, stent diameter and type, immediate and late complications and survival rate. Results: Regarding the esophageal stenting, most of the indications were malignant obstruction (155 cases of esophageal cancer and 30 cases of extrinsic compression), but also for esophageal fistula, peptic stenosis and even traumatic esophageal rupture. The majority of the enteral and colonic stents were inserted for malignant obstructions, having only 2 cases with benign obstructions. This is also the case for biliary stenting, were most of the indications were represented by pancreatic cancer. Technical and clinical success rates were approximately 92% and 80%, respectively. There were no major complications of perforation, bleeding, or death. insertion can be performed safely, with minimal complications and Conclusions: SEMS hospitalization allowing the restart of oral feeding and improvement of nutritional status for the digestive obstruction or jaundice disappearance in case of biliary obstruction. It represents the first option for unresectable digestive/biliary malignant obstruction.
Background: The most frequently encountered complication of anastomotic surgery is fistula. In addition to the medical history of the patient, local conditions, the operative moment and surgical technique that were chosen, a series of some other factors can interfere, leading to suture disunity. Aim: The aim of the study was to analyze the existence of a relationship between the use of cecostomy (as a mechanism of temporary diversion) and the frequency of anastomotic fistulas. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study, over a period of 7 years, between 2011-2018 taking into consideration 194 patients who benefited from resections completed with anastomoses in the transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid and rectum. They were divided into two categories: patients who benefited from cecostomy and patients for whom we did not use this technique. The frequency of fistulas was analyzed for the two main groups and in association with each type of surgery. Results: It was observed the existence of a relationship between the appearance of fistulas and the use of a decompression mechanism such as cecostomy in the sense of a lower number of fistulas for the first situation (2.66%) compared to 11.76% for cases without cecostomy (p=0.034). The duration of hospitalization in the group with cecostomy was shorter than in those without this derivative stoma and the postoperative recovery was good. Conclusions: Cecostomy is a useful protection for the anastomosis line, with the advantage that, when the tube is suppressed, the stoma will spontaneously close.
